Custom query (902 matches)

I just got a message indicating that the Conrad regarded me as a no show and is charging me the full price of the stay.

- I never had a reservation with the Conrad;
- I'm staying at the Courtyard at Times Square and I have a note from the Conrad acknowledging that fact;
- I expressed concern that the Conrad was asking for credit card details for the Marriott and they replied that they were processing both;
- I've never received any confirmation that I had any kind of reservation at the Conrad; and,
- I have no intention to pay A penalty for a reservation I never made.

Now the Conrad says that I should take this up with the conference organizers. Could you intervene on my behalf?

Thanks,

Mark

Mark McFadden
Principal Consultant, Internet Infrastructure and Governance
InterConnect Communications

Mobile: +44 (0) 7792 276 904
Skype: McElmside or +44 (0) 20 7558 8105
Email: MarkMcFadden@icc-uk.com<mailto:MarkMcFadden@icc-uk.com>
Web: http://www.icc-uk.com

InterConnect Communications Ltd, Merlin House, Station Road, Chepstow, NP16 5PB, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales, company registration no. 1828673.


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.  However, InterConnect makes no warranty that this email is virus-free.
________________________________________________________________________

NOC team,

FYI - this afternoon I've found the jabber.ietf.org<http://jabber.ietf.org> server lagging a bit.  It took a period of time to connect in to the chat room  (sidr@jabber.ietf.org<mailto:sidr@jabber.ietf.org>) in this particular case.

When I type something in the chat, it sometimes take 20-ish seconds to appear. However, after the first message gets posted subsequent messages seem to get posted quickly.

I'm using the Psi app on Mac OS X. The jabber server I'm connecting *from* is chatme.im.

This is NOT urgent as it is in fact working okay.  I'm just passing this along in case it will help diagnose issues.

Hope this helps,
Dan

--
Dan York
Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society
york@isoc.org<mailto:york@isoc.org>   +1-802-735-1624
Jabber: york@jabber.isoc.org<mailto:york@jabber.isoc.org>
Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork

http://www.internetsociety.org/

I had a problem communicating with datatracker.ietf.org. With the help 
of Bill Fenner and some debugging we figured out that this is due to 
IPv6 MTU problem on the second hop from the hotel. You can't ping6 
2001:770:8:45::1 with 1500 bytes, but you can with 1300. In practice 
this means that anyone using IPv6 will have serious problems. I tested 
to www.kame.net and MTU of 1432+40+8=1480 works, but nothing higher than 
that. So presumably we have a 20 byte IPv4 tunnel header somewhere. 
ICMPv6 packet too bigs or something should be generated, or the tunnel 
MTU changed. Fragments seem to have a problem too.

Here's what's happening:

root@dummy3:/tmp# traceroute6 datatracker.ietf.org
traceroute to datatracker.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::21) from 
2001:df8:0:16:216:6fff:fe75:6607, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets
 1  rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org (2001:df8:0:16::3)  8.519 ms  
1.457 ms  1.504 ms
 2  2001:770:8:45::1 (2001:770:8:45::1)  3.219 ms  3.129 ms  8.079 ms
 3  gig0-12-0-2-cr2-cwt.hea.net (2001:770:400:37::1)  8.505 ms  3.86 ms  
6.389 ms
 4  xe-2-1-0.dub20.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:3::c000:71)  3.134 ms  
16.201 ms  3.308 ms
 5  so-2-1-0.nyc22.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:421)  82.814 ms  
94.329 ms  88.522 ms
 6  so-3-0-0.was11.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:261)  101.731 ms  
88.808 ms  89.34 ms
 7  so-7-0-0.was10.ip6.tiscali.net (2001:668:0:2::1:232)  89.285 ms  
89.508 ms  94.378 ms
 8  ibr01-ve96.asbn01.occaid.net (2001:504:0:2:0:3:71:1)  92.142 ms  
90.306 ms
root@dummy3:/tmp#

root@dummy3:/tmp# ping6 -s 1434 www.kame.net
PING www.kame.net(orange.kame.net) 1434 data bytes

--- www.kame.net ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 10010ms

root@dummy3:/tmp# ping6 -s 1432 www.kame.net
PING www.kame.net(orange.kame.net) 1432 data bytes
1440 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=317 ms
1440 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=300 ms

--- www.kame.net ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 300.619/308.966/317.313/8.347 ms

root@dummy3:/tmp# ping6 -s 1500 rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org
PING 
rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org(rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org) 
1500 data bytes
1508 bytes from rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org: icmp_seq=1 
ttl=64 time=9.48 ms
1508 bytes from rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org: icmp_seq=2 
ttl=64 time=6.31 ms

--- rtrextb-wireless-open.meeting.ietf.org ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.310/7.895/9.481/1.587 ms
root@dummy3:/tmp#

root@dummy3:/tmp# ping6 -s 1500 2001:770:8:45::1
PING 2001:770:8:45::1(2001:770:8:45::1) 1500 data bytes

--- 2001:770:8:45::1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3010ms

root@dummy3:/tmp# ping6 -s 1300 2001:770:8:45::1
PING 2001:770:8:45::1(2001:770:8:45::1) 1300 data bytes
1308 bytes from 2001:770:8:45::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=9.46 ms

--- 2001:770:8:45::1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.463/9.463/9.463/0.000 ms

Jari